John Calvin might be thought by some a tyrant insensitive to the views of others, especially when it comes to interpreting Scripture, but R. Scott Clark makes the case that he was receptive to interpretations of the Bible by other commentators. He shows that Calvin’s use of “if anyone prefers” and “I do not object” (as in the English editions by the Calvin Translation Society) shows willingness to accept different interpretations. He also notes that the brevity of Calvin’s insights in the commentaries is because topics are developed more fully in the Institutes. See “Calvin as Exegetical Moderate” on Heidelblog.
You may also like
John Woodhull, Think Deeply, But Speak Plainly
The first annual meeting of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (PCUSA) convened in 1789 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The third assembly, the one that John Woodhull was the...
August 14, 2026
B. B. Warfield’s Reviews of His Own Writings
The following article is titled, “B. B. Warfield’s Reviews of His Own Writings in the Princeton Seminary Journals,” and was first published on pages 18-23 of the Fall/Winter 2022 newsletter, Reformed Forum, and is used...
August 7, 2026
N. L. Rice, Persistent Defender of Doctrine
Nathan Lewis was born December 29, 1807 in Garrard County, Kentucky to Gabriel and Phebe (Garrett) Rice. The family lived on a farm where the household struggled to make ends meet as did many rural families. Nathan...
July 31, 2026
Recent Posts
- John Woodhull, Think Deeply, But Speak Plainly August 14, 2026
- B. B. Warfield’s Reviews of His Own Writings August 7, 2026
- N. L. Rice, Persistent Defender of Doctrine July 31, 2026
- Joachim Neander, Praise to the Lord, the Almighty July 20, 2026
- Catalog of Parker Society Series on the English Reformation 55 Volumes July 10, 2026
- Presbyterian Letter to Churches on Ministry & Missions, 1791 July 3, 2026




